Free Essays on Effects Of Science On The Great Awakening

The Effects of Science on the Great Awakening If the sciences had been quicker to develop, the Great Awakening would not have happened. This is because people were seeing change as a good thing after the rapid spread of disease, which would be preventative when science did develop. Also, the ideas of modern scientists, made people begin to think of the gap between man and God as much smaller, and that the consequence of their actions all that much greater. The great Awakening was actually a series of revivals that took place in the American colonies spanning several years. It was a shift of religious teachings from the importance of the church to preaching of the importance of personal behavior. The changes that took place during the Great Awakening were so dramatic that those who took part in the awakening became known as the ‘New Lights’ and those who didn’t were called the ‘Old Lights’. Settlers in the American colonies seemed to have more trouble with disease than they had planned for. They were dealing with both the diseases that they had brought with them from England and those that were Native to their new home continent. They did their best to mix the old medicines they brought with them from Europe with the new remedies to provide cures for these new diseases (Cotton). Life on the frontier was especially hard and these settlers found that in these regions survival was truly every man for himself (Matthews). In these regions there were few familiar herbs available, and not many of the herbs brought with them were capable of growing in the new terrain. These people also had the least access to doctors as they lived so far west and their large plantations could often put several miles between themselves and any major city (Cotton). In this time period doctors studied the ideas from ancient texts such as those written by Hippocrates, Aristotle, Dicorides and Galen. They taught that sickness... Free Essays on Effects Of Science On The Great Awakening Free Essays on Effects Of Science On The Great Awakening The Effects of Science on the Great Awakening If the sciences had been quicker to develop, the Great Awakening would not have happened. This is because people were seeing change as a good thing after the rapid spread of disease, which would be preventative when science did develop. Also, the ideas of modern scientists, made people begin to think of the gap between man and God as much smaller, and that the consequence of their actions all that much greater. The great Awakening was actually a series of revivals that took place in the American colonies spanning several years. It was a shift of religious teachings from the importance of the church to preaching of the importance of personal behavior. The changes that took place during the Great Awakening were so dramatic that those who took part in the awakening became known as the ‘New Lights’ and those who didn’t were called the ‘Old Lights’. Settlers in the American colonies seemed to have more trouble with disease than they had planned for. They were dealing with both the diseases that they had brought with them from England and those that were Native to their new home continent. They did their best to mix the old medicines they brought with them from Europe with the new remedies to provide cures for these new diseases (Cotton). Life on the frontier was especially hard and these settlers found that in these regions survival was truly every man for himself (Matthews). In these regions there were few familiar herbs available, and not many of the herbs brought with them were capable of growing in the new terrain. These people also had the least access to doctors as they lived so far west and their large plantations could often put several miles between themselves and any major city (Cotton). In this time period doctors studied the ideas from ancient texts such as those written by Hippocrates, Aristotle, Dicorides and Galen. They taught that sickness...

Definition and Examples of Content (Lexical) Words

Definition and Examples of Content (Lexical) Words In English grammar and semantics, a  content word is a  word that conveys information in a text or speech act. Also known as a lexical word, lexical morpheme,  substantive category, or contentive.  Contrast with  function word  or grammatical word. In his book The Secret Life of Pronouns (2011), social psychologist James W. Pennebaker expands this definition: Content words are words that have a culturally shared meaning in labeling an object or action. . . . Content words are absolutely necessary to convey an idea to someone else. Content words- which include nouns, lexical verbs, adjectives, and adverbs- belong to open classes of words: that is, new members are readily added. The denotation of a content word, say  Kortmann and Loebner, is the category, or set, of all its potential referents (Understanding Semantics, 2014). Examples and Observations All morphemes can be divided into the categories lexical [content] and grammatical [function]. A lexical morpheme has a meaning that can be understood fully in and of itself- {boy}, for example, as well as {run}, {green}, {quick}, {paper}, {large}, {throw}, and {now}. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs are typical kinds of lexical morphemes. Grammatical morphemes, on the other hand- such as {of}, {and}, {the}, {ness}, {to}, {pre}, {a}, {but}, {in}, and {ly}- can be understood completely only when they occur with other words in a sentence. (Thomas E. Murray, The Structure of English. Allyn and Bacon, 1995)Reverend Howard Thomas  was the presiding elder over a district in  Arkansas, which included  Stamps. (Maya Angelou,  I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. Random House, 1969)Most people with low self-esteem have earned it. (George Carlin, Napalm Silly Putty. Hyperion, 2001)The  odor  of fish hung thick in the air. (Jack Driscoll,  Wanting Only to Be Heard. University of Massachusetts Press, 1995) Liberal and conservative have lost their meaning in America. I represent the distracted center. (Jon Stewart) Function Words vs. Content Words Grammatical words [function words] tend to be short: they are normally of one syllable and many are represented in spelling by less than three graphemes (I, he, do, on, or). Content words are longer and, with the exception of ox and American Englishs ax, are spelt with a minimum of three graphemes. This criterion of length can also be extended to the production of the two sets of words in connected speech. Here grammatical words are often unstressed or generally de-emphasised in pronunciation. (Paul Simpson, Language Through Literature. Routledge, 1997) All languages make some distinction between content words and function words.  Content words carry descriptive meaning; nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs are types of content word. Function words are typically little words, and they signal relations between parts of sentences, or something about the pragmatic import of a sentence, e.g. whether it is a question. Lewis Carrolls Jabberwocky poem illustrates the distinction well: Twas brillig, and the slithy tovesDid gyre and gimble in the wabe:All mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe. In this poem all the made-up words are content words; all the others are function words. In English, function words include determiners, such as the, a, my, your, pronouns (e.g. I, me, you, she, them), various auxiliary verbs (e.g. have, is, can, will do), coordinating conjunctions (and, or, but), and subordinating conjunctions (e.g. if, when, as, because). Prepositions are a borderline case. They have some semantic content, but are a small closed class, allowing hardly any historical innovation. Some English prepositions serve a mainly grammatical function, like of (what is the meaning of of?) and others have clear descriptive  (and relational) content, like under.  New content words in a language can  be readily invented; new nouns, in particular, are continually being coined, and new verbs (e.g. Google, gazump) and adjectives (e.g. naff, grungy) also not infrequently come into use. The small set of function words in a language, by contrast, is much more fixed and relatively steady over centuries. (James R. Hurford, The  Origins of Language: A Slim Guide.  Oxford University Press, 2014) Content Words in Speech Typically, the prominent syllable in a tone unit will be a content word (e.g. a noun or verb) rather than a function word (e.g. a preposition or article), since content words carry more meaning than function words. Function words will only be stressed if prominence on them is contextually warranted. (Charles F. Meyer, Introducing English Linguistics. Cambridge University  Press, 2010)

Interprofessional team working in healthcare delivery Essay

Interprofessional team working in healthcare delivery - Essay Example For this research, the case that will be analysed is the Case of Tom. This case has been chosen because of the following reasons. First, it puts into question the concept of patient–centeredness. In concrete experiences of patients, what does patient-centeredness means? Is it simply a mantra that we continuously repeat, but do not act upon or is it a reality for some patients and not for all? Second, because of the vagueness of the idea of patient-centeredness, the case highlights the wide divide between health policy and health care plan and that no matter hard policy makers think of coming up with ways that may theoretically realise patient centeredness of health care if it is not implemented in real cases, it is worth nothing. Third, it brings to the fore the issue of decision-making in cases of patients that are incapacitated in making the decisions for themselves. Fourth, it emphasises the unclear position of parents in decision-making when it comes to their child who is vulnerated by multiple learning disabilities. Fifth, it presents a stark contradiction to the ideal of interprofessional teamwork to achieve the best quality health care that can be provided to the patients. Finally, sixth, it brings us back to the basics of humanity – rights, dignity, respect, and human integrity. With these reasons, it will focus on the concept of interprofessional teamwork. The idea of patient-centred is the core of health care plan and interprofessional teamwork in health care services. ... These are 1. The issues pertinent to the autonomy, integrity, and dignity of Tom. 2. The ethical concern regarding decision-making in cases where in the patient is incapacitated to make an autonomous decision. 3. The issue of double standards in care vis-a-vis neglect in providing care. 4. The ethical issue of duty of people who are primarily responsible in providing the necessary care for Tom’s condition and 5. The ethical issue of malfeasance as a result of the negligence of the primary health care providers of Tom. All of these ethical issues are manifested by the failure of the health care team to assess, address and treat the expressions of pain by Tom, which is repeatedly re-affirmed by his parents. In this failure, the entire team failed to recognise and respect the dignity and integrity of Tom as a patient (Gaskell & Nightingale 2010). Tom is in a vulnerated condition of profound and multiple learning disabilities, which places him in a constant situation wherein his d ignity and integrity as a person is injured. In this context, treatment should be made available and accessible indiscriminately (Kottow 2010). In his condition, dignity in disease should not be equated with ‘dignity in uprightness’, but it is a differing dignity where â€Å"it is not so important whether we are sick or healthy; what matters is to be sick in a healthy way, and not healthy in a sick manner. In the question of autonomy, it is apparent that Tom is incapable of making an autonomous decision. As such, in his behalf, his parents have consistently shown that they are advocating for their child. Beauchamp and Childress (2009) have explained that the norm in disregarding parental decision in terms of treatment is when the decision is refusal of treatment that is